Betekenis van:
service book

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. If the person concerned served in the Spanish armed forces, enclose a copy of the service record book (cartilla militar) with form E 207.
2. If the person concerned served in the Spanish armed forces, enclose a copy of the service record book (cartilla militar) with form E 207. Failing this, provide the following information: year of conscription, service branch, function, province of recruitment and place of residence immediately after discharge.
3. have approved seagoing service of not less than one year as part of an approved training programme which includes on-board training which meets the requirements of Section A-II/1 of the STCW Code and is documented in an approved training record book, or otherwise have approved seagoing service of not less than three years;
4. If the person concerned served in the armed forces in Italy, in Latvia or in Lithuania or the former USSR, or in Slovakia or the former Czechoslovakia a copy of his service book (for Italy: ‘foglio matricolare’) or of his service record (for Italy: ‘stato di servizio’) should be enclosed where possible with the E 207 form.
5. the sum of the average net book value of fixed assets used by the air navigation service provider in operation or under construction and of the average value of the net current assets that are required for the provision of air navigation services; and
6. In order to compensate this loss of revenue, TAs would need to charge the end-user a service fee (which in its turn gives the end-user the incentive to book his tickets himself via ‘supplier.com’ instead of the TA, further decreasing the revenues of the TA).
7. other costs, such as the remaining book value of certain assets of other AVR companies acquired in order to provide the services stipulated in the service contract, the costs of site management and the cost of forgoing the contributions (‘dekkingsbijdrage’) that AVR IW would have received if the contract had been extended into 2005 and 2006, the non-budgeted costs of closure, and the costs of buying out multiannual contracts.
8. About EUR [...]* of this capital would be accounted for by the cash value of the guarantees described above (nominal economic value: EUR 6,1 billion); EUR [...]*‐ [...]* by the capital injection for supporting the group banks' loans, committed for the same purpose and utilised, to property service companies (which, if the nominal theoretical extreme risks are not covered from rent, renewal and book value guarantees, would have to be attributed to the risk assets at a value of EUR [...]*); and EUR [...]* to [...]* by a security premium.
9. This economic value was underpinned by an alternative calculation submitted by Germany: without the guarantees in the risk shield, liability for all the risks would have had to be ‘discharged’ with a capital injection of some EUR [...]*‐ [...]*. About EUR [...]* of this capital would be accounted for by the cash value of the guarantees described above (nominal economic value: EUR 6,1 billion); EUR [...]*‐ [...]* by the capital injection for supporting the group banks' loans, committed for the same purpose and utilised, to property service companies (which, if the nominal theoretical extreme risks are not covered from rent, renewal and book value guarantees, would have to be attributed to the risk assets at a value of EUR [...]*); and EUR [...]* to [...]* by a security premium.
10. €7,868 million for the additional redundancy costs attributable to the early closure of the remaining RDF. This amount is calculated as the difference between the estimated redundancy costs in the event of immediate closure and those in the event of closure at the end of the aid contract, i.e. two years later. The accepted amount is based on a detailed estimate that concerns some 244 workers and takes account of the fact that most of them can be redeployed internally; other costs, such as the remaining book value of certain assets of other AVR companies acquired in order to provide the services stipulated in the service contract, the costs of site management and the cost of forgoing the contributions (‘dekkingsbijdrage’) that AVR IW would have received if the contract had been extended into 2005 and 2006, the non-budgeted costs of closure, and the costs of buying out multiannual contracts. AVR had put these costs at €29,567 million in total, which included, for example, an amount of €11,716 million for the additional losses incurred by AVR Nuts in 2002 and 2003. In their negotiations, the State and AVR agreed on an amount of only €1,238 million.